What To Know
- However, the MR600 has a slight advantage with its smaller dimensions and lighter weight, making it even more portable for those who are constantly on the move.
- The Archer MR600 features two Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports, allowing you to connect wired devices such as computers or game consoles for a stable and high-speed connection.
- These include a USB port for file sharing and external storage, a microSD card slot for expanding storage, and a built-in VPN server for secure and private internet access.
In the realm of mobile routers, two giants stand out: the TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400. These devices promise to liberate you from Wi-Fi dependency and empower you with seamless internet connectivity on the go. But which one emerges as the undisputed champion? Let’s delve into their key features and performance to find out.
1. Design and Portability
Both the Archer MR600 and MR400 sport sleek and compact designs, making them easy to carry in your backpack or pocket. However, the MR600 has a slight advantage with its smaller dimensions and lighter weight, making it even more portable for those who are constantly on the move.
2. Network Connectivity
The Archer MR600 boasts a wider range of connectivity options compared to the MR400. It supports both 4G LTE and 5G networks, ensuring fast and reliable internet access even in areas with limited coverage. The MR400, on the other hand, is limited to 4G LTE connectivity.
3. Wi-Fi Performance
The Archer MR600 excels in Wi-Fi performance, thanks to its support for the latest Wi-Fi 6 standard. This translates to significantly faster speeds, reduced latency, and improved range. The MR400, which supports Wi-Fi 5, still provides decent performance but falls short in delivering the same level of speed and coverage.
4. LAN Ports
The Archer MR600 features two Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports, allowing you to connect wired devices such as computers or game consoles for a stable and high-speed connection. The MR400 has only one LAN port, which may be a limitation for users who need to connect multiple wired devices.
5. Battery Life
The Archer MR600 has a slightly larger battery capacity (3000 mAh) compared to the MR400 (2550 mAh). This translates to longer battery life, allowing you to stay connected for extended periods without having to worry about recharging.
6. Additional Features
The Archer MR600 offers a few additional features that enhance its functionality. These include a USB port for file sharing and external storage, a microSD card slot for expanding storage, and a built-in VPN server for secure and private internet access.
7. Price
The TP-Link Archer MR600 is priced slightly higher than the Archer MR400. However, the premium price comes with a host of additional features and performance enhancements that justify the investment for users who demand the best.
The Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?
The choice between the TP-Link Archer MR600 and TP-Link Archer MR400 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize speed, coverage, and advanced features, the Archer MR600 is the clear winner. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable option with solid performance, the Archer MR400 is a great choice.
Questions We Hear a Lot
1. Which router has better Wi-Fi range?
The Archer MR600 has a wider Wi-Fi range thanks to its support for Wi-Fi 6.
2. Can I use both routers as a power bank?
No, neither the Archer MR600 nor MR400 can be used as power banks.
3. Which router supports faster internet speeds?
The Archer MR600 supports both 4G LTE and 5G networks, providing faster internet speeds compared to the MR400.
4. Which router has longer battery life?
The Archer MR600 has a larger battery capacity, resulting in longer battery life.
5. Can I connect multiple devices to both routers?
Yes, both the Archer MR600 and MR400 support multiple device connections.
6. Which router is better for gaming?
The Archer MR600 is a better choice for gaming due to its faster Wi-Fi speeds and reduced latency.
