What To Know
- Two of the most popular options on the market are the TP-Link Archer MR400 and MR600.
- In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the TP-Link Archer MR400 vs MR600 to help you make an informed decision.
- The MR600, in contrast, offers more advanced features, including a built-in VPN server, parental controls, and a guest network.
The world of mobile routers has become increasingly competitive, with manufacturers vying for dominance. Two of the most popular options on the market are the TP-Link Archer MR400 and MR600. Both routers offer impressive features, but which one is the right choice for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the TP-Link Archer MR400 vs MR600 to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Build Quality
The TP-Link Archer MR400 sports a compact and lightweight design, making it easy to carry around. Its sleek black finish gives it a modern and professional look. The MR600, on the other hand, is slightly larger and heavier, but its rugged construction ensures durability. Its bold red accents add a touch of style.
Connectivity and Speed
The TP-Link Archer MR400 supports up to 4G LTE Cat 4 connectivity, providing download speeds of up to 150 Mbps. The MR600, however, offers faster connectivity with 4G LTE Cat 6, reaching download speeds of up to 300 Mbps. Both routers feature dual-band Wi-Fi, allowing you to connect multiple devices simultaneously with minimal interference.
Features
The TP-Link Archer MR400 is equipped with a USB port that allows you to connect external storage devices or share files. It also has a microSD card slot for expanding storage. The MR600, in contrast, offers more advanced features, including a built-in VPN server, parental controls, and a guest network.
Battery Life
Battery life is crucial for mobile routers. The TP-Link Archer MR400 has a 2,600 mAh battery that provides up to 10 hours of usage. The MR600, with its larger 3,000 mAh battery, offers an impressive 15 hours of battery life.
Portability
The TP-Link Archer MR400’s compact size and lightweight design make it highly portable. It can easily fit into a pocket or backpack. The MR600, while slightly larger, still maintains a reasonable level of portability thanks to its built-in carrying handle.
Price
The TP-Link Archer MR400 is typically priced around $50-$70, while the MR600 ranges from $80-$100. The price difference reflects the MR600’s faster connectivity and additional features.
Which One Should You Choose?
The best choice between the TP-Link Archer MR400 vs MR600 depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize affordability, portability, and basic connectivity, the MR400 is an excellent option. However, if you require faster speeds, advanced features, and extended battery life, the MR600 is the better choice.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which router has better Wi-Fi coverage?
A: Both routers offer similar Wi-Fi coverage, but the MR600’s dual-band Wi-Fi may provide a slight advantage in certain environments.
Q: Can I use either router as a wired router?
A: Yes, both routers can be used as wired routers by connecting them to a modem via an Ethernet cable.
Q: Which router has better parental controls?
A: The TP-Link Archer MR600 offers more comprehensive parental controls, including website filtering and time restrictions.
