What To Know
- It can scan a 4″ x 6″ photo in under 10 seconds, while the V39 II takes around 20 seconds.
- The V39 II offers a slightly higher resolution and an ADF, but the LiDE 400 is much faster and has more user-friendly software.
- Whether you’re a home user looking for a budget-friendly scanner or a small business owner who needs an ADF, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 and Epson Perfection V39 II offer different strengths and weaknesses.
In the realm of document and photo scanning, two budget-friendly options stand out: the Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 and the Epson Perfection V39 II. Both scanners offer a range of features and capabilities, but which one is right for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the specs, performance, and value of each scanner to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications
| Feature | Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 | Epson Perfection V39 II |
| — | — | — |
| Sensor Type | CIS | CIS |
| Resolution | 2400 x 4800 dpi | 4800 x 4800 dpi |
| Scanning Area | 8.5″ x 11.7″ | 8.5″ x 11.7″ |
| Bit Depth | 48-bit | 48-bit |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Dimensions | 11.1″ x 16.4″ x 1.3″ | 11.6″ x 17.9″ x 1.7″ |
| Weight | 3.3 lbs | 4.4 lbs |
Performance
Scan Quality:
Both scanners produce sharp and clear scans at their native resolutions. However, the Epson Perfection V39 II has a slight edge in detail and color accuracy, especially when scanning photos.
Speed:
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 is significantly faster than the Epson Perfection V39 II. It can scan a 4″ x 6″ photo in under 10 seconds, while the V39 II takes around 20 seconds.
Software:
Both scanners come with their own software suites. The Canon LiDE 400’s software is more user-friendly and offers a wider range of editing and enhancement tools. The Epson V39 II’s software is more basic but does include OCR functionality.
Features
Automatic Document Feeder:
The Epson Perfection V39 II has an automatic document feeder (ADF) that can hold up to 30 pages. This is a valuable feature for scanning large batches of documents quickly and efficiently. The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 does not have an ADF.
Transparency Scanning:
Neither scanner supports transparency scanning, such as slides or negatives.
Value
The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 is typically priced around $100, while the Epson Perfection V39 II is around $150. The V39 II offers a slightly higher resolution and an ADF, but the LiDE 400 is much faster and has more user-friendly software.
Which Scanner is Right for You?
Canon CanoScan LiDE 400:
- Ideal for home users and students who need a fast and affordable scanner for documents and photos.
- Not suitable for scanning large batches of documents or transparencies.
Epson Perfection V39 II:
- Better choice for users who prioritize scan quality and need an ADF.
- Suitable for both home and small office use.
- Not as fast as the LiDE 400 and has less user-friendly software.
Alternatives to Consider
Brother ADS-1250W:
- A wireless scanner with an ADF for convenient scanning.
- Priced around $150.
HP ScanJet Pro 2000 s2:
- A compact scanner with a flatbed and ADF.
- Priced around $200.
Key Points: The Perfect Choice for Your Scanning Needs
Whether you’re a home user looking for a budget-friendly scanner or a small business owner who needs an ADF, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 and Epson Perfection V39 II offer different strengths and weaknesses. By carefully considering your specific needs and preferences, you can choose the scanner that best meets your requirements.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q: Which scanner is better for scanning photos?
A: The Epson Perfection V39 II has a slight edge in photo scanning quality.
Q: Which scanner is faster?
A: The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 is significantly faster than the Epson Perfection V39 II.
Q: Which scanner has an ADF?
A: Only the Epson Perfection V39 II has an ADF.
Q: Which scanner is more portable?
A: The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 is more compact and lightweight than the Epson Perfection V39 II.
Q: Which scanner has better software?
A: The Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 has more user-friendly software with a wider range of editing tools.
